Minutes
DEFIANCE TOWNSHIP
TRUSTEES
December 30th, 2008 MEETING
The Defiance Township Trustees met in regular session at the
Defiance County Commissioners building – 2nd Floor conference room, 500 Court Street, in Defiance Township, Defiance, Ohio, on December 30th, 2008 at 7:30 p.m.
Following the Pledge of Allegiance the Chair instructed the clerk to
call the roll, answering as present were: Daniel Peck, Charles A. Bakle Jr. and
Richard Ankney; also present was
Tim Houck, Township Fiscal Officer-Clerk.
All three (3) members of the BOARD OF TRUSTEES having answered the roll,
a quorum was present.
Township employees present: John Diemer – 23361 Defiance-Paulding Co Line
Rd, and James Schlegel (equipment operator and zoning inspector) – 220
Pinewood.
Other(s) present were: Ruth Ann
Schofield 15968 Campbell Rd, Penny
Bakle 1204 Washington Ave, Carl
Wagner 24815 Watson Rd, Patty Diemer 23361 Defiance-Paulding Co Line Rd, & JoEllen Houck of 8 Deville Drive,
Defiance, Ohio.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 1
Review and approval of minutes of the previous session.
a)
Chairman
Ankney requested a motion for the approval of minutes from the November 25th, regular session.
MOTION: Charles Bakle
SECOND: Dan Peck
YEA(s) 3 NAY(s) 0 Passed X Failed
The MINUTEÕS
for the November 25th, session
were approved.
ORDER OF
BUSINESS NO. 2 - citizens concerns
a)
The
chair asked for citizen concerns from the floor.
i) There was none.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 3 - FINANCES –
The following financial reports provided to the Board were
reviewed.
a)
The November
monthly Reconciliation – noted a primary checking reconciliation balance
of $184,627.94 as of November 30th, 2008É.. balance is minus the outstanding checks and Township
investment funds.
b)
Receipt
& Payment reports
i)
Receipts
for December 2008 were $14,605.97.
Payments for December (bills & payroll) totaled $35,294.91.
c)
The
Cash fund summary through December 31st, 2008, showed an
Òending cash balanceÓ of $885,054.93.
d)
The
unencumbered cash balance Òcash availableÓ was $720,028.59 which is the balance
after encumbrances are subtracted from the cash balance.
e)
Appropriation
Status showed that through December 31st, 2008, 21% of
the yearsÕ appropriations had been expended. The budget is in line with the
goals set by the Trustees to put aside a cash reserve to be applied to the 2nd
half of the Kiser Road re-build project which is scheduled for the 2009
construction season. All reports
will be on file in the Fiscal OfficerÕs office.
f)
The
fund status report showed:
i)
The
money market investment fund balance as of 12-31-08 was $721,115.93.
g)
The
Trustees reviewed and signed the bills for the month.
h)
payroll
for December was then reviewed and checks signed by the Trustees.
i)
The
fiscal officer informed the Trustees and the twp staff that the Twp accounts
for 2008 are closed and nothing can be spent until Trustees meet at the
organizational session on Jan 13th and adopt the 2009
appropriations.
i)
All
acknowledged their understanding of this normal year end procedure.
Mr. Ankney requested
a motion to accept the December financial reports.
MOTION by:
Charles Bakle
SECOND
by: Dan Peck
YEA(s) 3 NAY(s) 0 Passed X Failed
The December financial reports were approved.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 4 – Zoning - Status update on the following
zoning Issues as of this session:
a)
The
Chair asked for the Monthly Zoning report
- InspectorÕs Report -
Mr. Jim Schlegel
i)
December
2008
(1)
Recieved a complaint
from Norm Solly 20096 Powers Rd.
He advises a recently dug pond behind his home at 13113 Krouse Rd is
causing surface water to drain onto his property. I contacted Def Co Soil &
Water, Chad responded and did a site review taking pictures. Chad advised me he
did not see a problem. I also did a site review and all water had drained off
as well. I feel the proper action to take at this time is a wait & see
approach. The next heavy rain in this area I will do another site review.
b)
Chairman
Ankney asked if there is any other zoning issues to come before the Board.
i)
There
were none.
ORDER OF
BUSINESS NO. 5
-- Equipment;
a)
The
Chair asked if there were any comments or concerns from Twp employees on
current or proposed new eq.
i)
Mr. Schlegel stated that the transmission
on the international dump truck seems to be sticking. Mr. diemer said
this is normal for this unit. The
unit operates ok only that there is a slight delay in shifting into gear from
the point of moving the shift from one gear to another.
ii)
There
were no other issues noted.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 6 - Trustee Report – Monthly Twp Rd inspection
a)
The Trustee
Monthly Twp Rd inspection report, exhibit 6-a as completed by Trustee Peck was
reviewed.
i)
Mr. Peck
advised:
(1)
That
the roads were snow and ice covered.
(a)
Sponseller
has a wash out west side just north of the county line.
ii)
Mr. Bakle stated the sheriffÕs office
called him during the recent ice storm and asked to have twp trucks salt.
(1)
Trustees
noted that it is twp policy to salt only the intersections – same policy
as the Co EngineerÕs office.
(a)
Trustees
confirmed this policy but retain the right to instruct crew to salt roads as
the situation may dictate after consultation with Trustees.
iii)
Mr. Diemer then noted that the Co line road
has several sever ice covered spots.
This road goes from clear to ice and is somewhat hazardous in his
opinion.
(1)
Trustees
instructed crew to salt the ice patches.
(2)
Schlegel
asked for clarification as to when he is to go out on the roads.
b)
Project(s)
review: –
i)
Up-date on existing road projects
– there is presently one major planned project for 09:
(1)
Kiser
Rd project (1 full
mile from Keller to Canal) – to be done in 2009.
(a)
See
minutes forward from the Jan 07 session for project details.
(b)
As of
12-30:
(i)
the
engineerÕs cost estimate remains $270,000 to $350,00 including engineerÕs
office project expense for engineering and project management.
(ii)
the
Engineer was approved to coordinate some of the drainage work which is to take
place in fall 08 and cost is limited to $24,000.
1.
this
has not taken place as of this session.
(iii)
The
Trustees voted in the July session to re-bid the project in Jan – Feb 09.
(iv)
The
fiscal officer reported that the engineer contacted him in Dec. to have him
present to the Trustees the following:
1.
If the
engineerÕs office re-bids the project in jan-feb 09 then the above noted
drainage work would be included in that bid spec.
2.
If the
Trustees wish to have the eng coordinate the drainage work then the road const
proj bid would be set back until March or April so that a ÒstartÓ date specific
could be identified in the bid specifications.
3.
Trustees
must make a decision soon which method they desire.
4.
The
engineer thought that the best prices might be achieved with the drainage work
included as construction companies are looking for work now.
(c)
The
chair asked for discussion.
(i)
Trustees
agreed that it would be best for the Twp to bid the project as a whole
including the drainage work which was previously to be separated out; so that
the project could reach a conclusion.
Mr. Ankney requested a motion to accept the
EngineerÕs recommendation to bid the project in Jan. the project will included the drainage work.
MOTION by:
Dan Peck
SECOND
by: Charles Bakle
YEA(s) 3 NAY(s) 0 Passed X Failed
The 2nd half Kiser road project –
including drainage work – was approved for public bidding. Mr. Ankney will inform the County
Engineer to proceed with the public bid process.
(d)
This
item will remain on the agenda until completed
ii)
Twp
cemeteries –
(a)
The
Chair asked if there was any discussion on Twp cemeteries?
(i)
It was
noted that limbs had been removed from ice damaged trees along St Rte 111 from
the recent ice storm. There limbs
were stacked up near the entrance to Cromley cemetery. Trustees believe the local electric
company servicing that area must have done this maintenance work. Trustees instructed the Twp crew to
wait a week or so to see if the electric company would pick these limbs
up. If not the Twp crew would pick
these up and dispose of them.
iii)
Trustees
then reviewed Exhibit 6-c – iii.
This is the annual County EngineerÕs office 2009 Òparticipation
form. Trustees must review and
sign. Trustees determined that the
Kiser road rebuild project is probably all that could be done this year
relative to the Township budget.
The form was filled out to indicate that Kiser Rd rebuild would be the
Twp project for 2009. All Trustees
signed the form and instructed the clerk to return it to the Co Engineer.
c)
The
Chair asked if there were other possible road projects or comments.
i)
There
was no other project discussion.
ORDER OF
BUSINESS NO. 7 – Handouts were
distributed as noted below:
a)
The Monthly
(December 08) GrassRoots clippings was presented as exhibit 8-a
ORDER OF
BUSINESS NO. 8 - Old Business
a)
Def
Twp Trustees discussed the process of their position to have Def Twp
represented on the Ayersville Water & Sewer Bd. This position was taken at the Nov 08 session.
i)
Mr.
Peck said he was in email communication with AWSB attorney Kim Baker. A copy of the email is in the clerkÕs
files. The Highland Twp Trustees
appoint to this Board. She is
working with Mr. Peck to determine if a Def Twp Trustee recommendation would
receive an appointment.
ii)
Def
Twp Trustees have recommended Mr. Carl Wagner 24815 Watson Rd. Mr. Wagner was recognized and stated he
had been in contact with the AWSB but was told they would let him know by Dec31st
and he has not heard anything.
iii)
Mr.
Peck said he would re-contact Ms. Baker.
b)
The
chair asked if there was any other old business? There was none.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 9 - New Business
a)
The
Chair asks if there is any new business to come before the board?
b)
Exhibit
9-a is an email
from the solid waste district coordinatorÕs office asking for the Twp to
approve a resolution of support of the recently re-written Solid Waste District
waste management plan. It notes
that the Plan is essentially a duplicate of the current plan. The rewrite is a requirement by state
law and is done every five years.
A copy of the plan is available for review on the web at http://www.defiance-county.com/esl/DFPW-2008.pdf
i)
The
rewritten plan has passed a 30 day public notice period and public hearing
without comment.
ii)
The
Chair asked if there were any questions.
There were none.
iii)
The
Chair asked for a motion to approve the proposed resolution #11-2008 of support
for the swd Plan.
MOTION by:
Charles Bakle
SECOND
by: Dan Peck
YEA(s) 3 NAY(s) 0 Passed X Failed
The resolution of support – exhibit 9-a resolution
#11-2008 was approved.
c)
Trustees
then reviewed Exhibit 9-b, a notice from the County Engineer of the annual ÒDef
Co Trustees and Elected OfficialsÓ meeting hosted by the County Engineer. This session will be at the Co EMA
building in Brunersburg on Jan 15th @ 6p.m. cost is $8 per person.
i)
The
clerk will phone in the RSVPÕs
ii)
All Trustees
& the fiscal officer will attend.
d)
The Defiance
county soil and water provided Trustees exhibit 9-c – a packet of
information on the proposed investigation of a need to clean the Colwell
ditch. There were be a public
hearing on Jan 6th, @
7p.m. at the soil and water office at the CountyÕs Evergreen Lane office
complex on Evansport road.
i)
Trustees
will be represented at the meeting.
e)
Trustees
were then informed that the annual State Twp Winter conf is Feb 4, 5 &
6, 2009.
i)
The
fiscal officer will make attendance arrangements for those Trustees who wish to
attend.
(1)
Mr.
Ankney and the fiscal officer will be attending.
f)
The
Chair asked if there is any other new business to come before the board?
i)
Mr.
Peck stated he believed that that the issue of the grindings from ODOT which
were received by the Twp during the late summer of 08 should be more clearly
defined in the mins. Some of the
grindings were placed by ODOT directly on the Twp work site - Krouse rd. The placement of the grindings on
Krouse road was at the direction of Mr. Bakle while he served in his capacity
as a supervisor for ODOT. This caused
the State ODOT to investigate a possible ODOT work rule violation.
(1)
This
issue developed in the early spring when Trustees discussed the possibility of
getting grindings from ODOT const projects and using these grindings on Twp
roads. (see Oct, Sept, and April
08 mins – which refer to the Krouse rd proj). The April mins noted that the Twp requested grindings from
ODOT to be placed on Krouse rd during the 08 construction season. This comment was the interpretation of
the clerk-fiscal officer.
(2)
Mr.
Peck and Mr. Ankney noted they had been contacted by ODOTÕs investigator (John
Shore) earlier this year and questioned about the process in which the Twp
worked with ODOT officials to acquire the grindings. ODOT only takes this type of material to central storage
areas. ODOT employees are not
allowed to work on non-state projects.
(3)
The
fiscal office had also been contacted by Mr. Shore.
(4)
Mr.
Peck wants a summary of the issue in the minutes:
(a)
Def
Twp requested grindings from ODOT; both Mr. Ankney and Mr. Bakle made this
request.
(b)
The
mins of AprilÕs session noted that the Twp requested the grinds be placed on
Krouse rd – those mins were the interpretation of the discussion during
the April session by the clerk-fiscal officer.
(i)
That interpretation
has no impact on ODOT rules. (the
clerk made this same statement to ODOTÕs investigator.)
(c)
Mr.
Bakle ordered the grindings (as an ODOT supervisor) to be placed on Krouse rd.
(i)
ODOTÕs
position is that the grindings should only have been taken to a Twp storage
area(the Twp maintenance building).
So placing some of the grindings on Krouse rd was an apparent violation
of ODOT rules.
ii)
Both
Mr. Ankney and Mr. Peck were told that any future issues involving ODOT and the
Twp should have Mr. Bakle abstaining from discussion and from voting on those issues.
g)
The
Chair asked if there was any new business to come before the Board?
i)
There
was none.
ORDER OF BUSINESS NO. 10 - NEXT MEETING:
Time: 7:30
p.m.
Place: 2nd
floor of the Defiance County Commissioners building – conf room EMOC
500
Court Street - Defiance, Ohio
Mr. Ankney
then requested a motion to adjourn the meeting of December 30th, 2008.
It was moved by: Mr. Bakle
SECOND
by: Mr. Peck
The roll
was called and the vote was:
YEA(s) 3 NAY(s) 0 The
motion: Passed X Failed
Respectfully Submitted
Timothy J. Houck, Fiscal Officer-Clerk